Starting with Kong CE 0.13 and the upcoming EE 0.32, it is possible to separate control and data planes in a Kong cluster.
So what are those planes? The control plane is how we instrument the system (pushing configs, fetching logs), whereas the data plane is the traffic that is actually being proxied by the system.
Consider a factory. The factory has a conveyor belt, and on this belt the parts are added, the products assembled and finally packed and shipped. But to run this factory we need a lot more: logistics, work schedules, maintenance, quality reports, and what not. In this example the conveyor belt would be the data plane, where all the auxiliary stuff to enable the belt to deliver the products would be the control plane.
Kong works as a cluster of independent, stateless, nodes. All the Kong nodes in a given cluster are connected to the same database, from which the nodes get their configuration information. Up till now each Kong node would expose a port where it would serve traffic for the proxy (data plane), and another for configuration (the RESTful management API, the control plane).
With the new release we have refactored the way the ports are configured which allows for greater flexibility in infrastructure architecture and system control. This will enable the following uses:
This now opens up the possibility to proxy API traffic through Kong via one network segment, while administering Kong via a different network segment, which provides better isolation of the components, without risking accidentally opening up the Kong admin API to the whole internet.
To achieve this we removed the following (default) settings:
# Proxy
proxy_listen = 0.0.0.0:8000
proxy_listen_ssl = 0.0.0.0:8443
ssl = on
http2 = off
# Admin API
admin_listen = 127.0.0.1:8001
admin_listen_ssl = 127.0.0.1:8444
admin_ssl = on
admin_http2 = off
The format changed into a comma separated list of addresses with flags:
proxy_listen = [off] | <ip>:<port> [ssl] [http2] [proxy_protocol], ...
admin_listen = [off] | <ip>:<port> [ssl] [http2] [proxy_protocol], ... This format allows for multiple address/port combinations and flags to configure each of those. The new defaults, mimicking the exact same behavior of the old settings are:
proxy_listen = 0.0.0.0:8000, 0.0.0.0:8443 ssl
admin_listen = 127.0.0.1:8000, 127.0.0.1:8443 ssl
Given the new configuration properties we can now simply create a data-plane node by starting Kong with the `admin_listen` setting disabled:
$ KONG_ADMIN_LISTEN=off && kong start
Similarly for a control-plane node we can disable the `proxy_listen` setting:
$ KONG_PROXY_LISTEN=off && kong start
Stop me if you’ve heard this one before, but there’s a lot of data out there — and the amount is only growing. Estimates typically show persistent data growth roughly at a 20% annual compounded rate. Capturing, storing, analyzing, and actioning data
The example below shows how an AI agent can be built using Volcano SDK with minimal code, while still interacting with backend services in a controlled way. The agent is created by first configuring an LLM, then defining an MCP (Model Context Prot
This blog post is part two of a two-part series on how we broke down our monolith to scale our API management with Kong Gateway, the world's most popular open-source API gateway . ( Here's part one .) At NexJ , the pioneer of intelligent customer
Your Kafka Doesn't Have to Live Behind a Wall When teams resort to VPC peering or PrivateLink to expose Kafka, they're not solving the problem — they're managing it, one network topology decision at a time. Every new external consumer adds compl
With Kong Ingress Controller, when your Control Plane was hosted in Kong Konnect, and you were using Kubernetes Gateway API, your dataplane, routes, and services were in read-only mode. When using Kong Ingress Controller with Kubernetes Gateway API
This is the pitch to the board and the C-suite. It must be brutally concise, focused entirely on your business outcomes, not the technology. If the first page doesn't articulate value, the strategy dies. Why? It immediately frames the initiative in
The Challenge: Securing Distributed Systems Netflix operates over 1,000 microservices handling two billion daily requests (Microservices architecture: from Netflix to APIs). One security gap can trigger cascading breaches. Traditional perimeter sec